By Robert Nyasato
The United Opposition’s argument that naming a joint presidential candidate too early would expose its hand to President William Ruto is becoming increasingly difficult to defend.
In a contest where time, organisation and public confidence matter, keeping the country guessing is not necessarily a strategy. It can just as easily become a recipe for confusion.
Also Read
With the August 10, 2027 General Election approaching, opposition leaders face a fundamental question: are they building a credible alternative government or simply assembling a coalition whose members agree on their rival but remain divided over who should lead them?
Recent developments suggest the latter challenge is becoming harder to ignore. On October 6, The Star reported that disagreements among influential allies of opposition presidential hopefuls were complicating efforts to settle on a common flag bearer.
The emerging contest involves Wiper leader Kalonzo Musyoka, Jubilee’s Fred Matiang’i, Democracy for Citizens Party leader Rigathi Gachagua and Nairobi Senator Edwin Sifuna, among others.
The argument that early identification of a candidate would give Ruto an advantage also raises an obvious question: what exactly would the President learn that he does not already know?
He has worked with, negotiated against or observed these politicians for years. Their political ambitions, regional constituencies, alliances and public positions are hardly state secrets. Announcing a joint candidate would not suddenly introduce unfamiliar players into Kenya’s political arena.
What the opposition risks losing through prolonged indecision is valuable time to explain its agenda, organise its campaign structures, negotiate internal compromises and reassure supporters that the coalition can manage disagreements without falling apart.
There are two realistic routes available. The first is for individual parties to promote their presidential aspirants while negotiating a credible framework for eventually selecting one candidate. This would allow each contender to test their appeal, although it could also deepen rivalries and leave behind resentments that are difficult to manage.
The second is to negotiate and announce a joint candidate early enough to give the coalition time to resolve disagreements over the running mate, power-sharing arrangements, campaign responsibilities and the policy agenda.
Neither route is without risks. Early selection could alienate supporters of unsuccessful aspirants, while prolonged competition could turn a coalition-building exercise into a contest of political egos. The critical issue is whether the leaders have agreed on transparent rules for reaching a decision and accepting its outcome.
The Kalonzo-Sifuna-Matiang’i question illustrates the difficulty. Kalonzo brings decades of national political experience, Dr Matiang’i has built his profile around his record in government, while Sifuna’s emergence has introduced a prominent generational dimension to the debate.
These are not minor differences that can be wished away through joint appearances and declarations of unity. They require serious negotiations, clear criteria and a willingness to compromise.
The opposition also needs to move beyond the assumption that agreeing on one candidate is, by itself, a winning formula. Kenyans will want to know what a proposed alternative government intends to do about the cost of living, public debt, employment, healthcare, education and accountability. A coalition that spends all its energy negotiating positions risks leaving little time to explain its policies.
Ultimately, the opposition must decide whether its strategy is to keep Ruto guessing or to give voters a clear picture of the alternative on offer. The two objectives are not necessarily compatible when secrecy becomes an excuse for avoiding difficult decisions.
If the leaders postpone the flag-bearer question until the final months of the campaign, they could find themselves negotiating under pressure, with limited time to repair divisions and build a coherent national platform.
The ballot will not organise the opposition for them. Their supporters cannot be expected to settle a leadership dispute that the principals themselves have failed to resolve.
For the United Opposition, the real test is no longer whether it can keep its candidate a secret. It is whether it can turn its promise of unity into a workable political arrangement before the clock runs out.
Mr. Nyasato is a member of the Gusii Press Club.
